‘Sharifs and court’

Published September 20, 2017

THIS refers to your editorial ‘The path ahead for Sharifs & court’ (Sept 16). The observation that “ the Supreme Court verdict against Mr Sharif was disappointing from a strictly legal perspective” is reprehensible and uncalled for. Such unwarranted comments question the competence, jurisdiction and locus standi of the country’s highest judicial forum, which gave numerous opportunities to the Sharifs to defend themselves.

Nawaz Sharif is fortunate that he got the chance to submit a review petition against the disqualification verdict of the Supreme Court. It is a different matter that his lawyers were unable to submit a single defence argument in front of the review bench. It is recalled that there was no review appeal filing in ZAB’s death case, nor was this privilege availed of by Saulat Mirza after the confirmation of his death conviction.

According to the rules, the review appeal is heard by the same bench as announces the judgement. Forming a new bench or a larger bench would be amount to reopening the case. There is no reason why Mr Sharif should have been given an exception in the case.

Arshad M. Khawaja

Karachi

(2)

APROPOS the editorial ‘The path ahead for Sharifs and court’ (Sept 16). I refer to a sentence: “….institutions, particularly the judiciary, need to demonstrate that faith in the constitutional democratic process is justified.” I am not sure what your editorial was trying to say.

Faith in any constitutional democratic process is just that, a matter of faith. And what such faith requires of all players in the game is that the process be respected and that no player should feel he has the right to manage or manipulate the process because he thinks he knows better.

But whose faith, exactly, in the constitutional democratic process, as you call it, was the editorial questioning? Those who believe that governments should be both elected and removed by the electorate? Or those who believe that they are sometimes (often!) obliged to take matters into their own hands for the good of the people, who really aren’t clever or educated enough to choose and remove their own leaders, and therefore, must act as they know better how Pakistan should be governed?

Ali Khan

Islamabad

Published in Dawn, September 20th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

IMF’s projections
Updated 18 Apr, 2024

IMF’s projections

The problems are well-known and the country is aware of what is needed to stabilise the economy; the challenge is follow-through and implementation.
Hepatitis crisis
18 Apr, 2024

Hepatitis crisis

THE sheer scale of the crisis is staggering. A new WHO report flags Pakistan as the country with the highest number...
Never-ending suffering
18 Apr, 2024

Never-ending suffering

OVER the weekend, the world witnessed an intense spectacle when Iran launched its drone-and-missile barrage against...
Saudi FM’s visit
Updated 17 Apr, 2024

Saudi FM’s visit

The government of Shehbaz Sharif will have to manage a delicate balancing act with Pakistan’s traditional Saudi allies and its Iranian neighbours.
Dharna inquiry
17 Apr, 2024

Dharna inquiry

THE Supreme Court-sanctioned inquiry into the infamous Faizabad dharna of 2017 has turned out to be a damp squib. A...
Future energy
17 Apr, 2024

Future energy

PRIME MINISTER Shehbaz Sharif’s recent directive to the energy sector to curtail Pakistan’s staggering $27bn oil...